<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dr. Watson, you need some rest..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/</link>
	<description>Can you see what I see?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Anthroblogogist</title>
		<link>http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/#comment-6791</link>
		<dc:creator>The Anthroblogogist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/#comment-6791</guid>
		<description>Greetings,

Excellent article, great points, very clean and concise. I enjoyed reading and agree with you. Thanks for sharing. 

Oh and to the Ali T. and other similar comparisons that pull in a similar offense with different participants and note that the responses aren't the same. I say that you have to look at the history of the people. Any type of violation to a historically oppressed group of people will have a larger amount of protest than would a violation to a group that historically has promoted itself over all others. Its not that anything is pro-"jewish", pro-black etc its just that people are more sensitive to the person being bullied, so to speak, and not the person traditionally being picked on. In the event that the analogous bully is served up a does of their own medicine, people don't blink so much. White people aren't going to lose any sleep or money over something like this, their world image is too solidly ingrained to be shaken so easily. But blacks, "jews", hispanics, etc might suffer an increase in discrimination that might directly effect their quality of living. 

Sincerely,
The Anthroblogogist
http://TheAnthroblogogist.50webs.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings,</p>
<p>Excellent article, great points, very clean and concise. I enjoyed reading and agree with you. Thanks for sharing. </p>
<p>Oh and to the Ali T. and other similar comparisons that pull in a similar offense with different participants and note that the responses aren&#8217;t the same. I say that you have to look at the history of the people. Any type of violation to a historically oppressed group of people will have a larger amount of protest than would a violation to a group that historically has promoted itself over all others. Its not that anything is pro-&#8221;jewish&#8221;, pro-black etc its just that people are more sensitive to the person being bullied, so to speak, and not the person traditionally being picked on. In the event that the analogous bully is served up a does of their own medicine, people don&#8217;t blink so much. White people aren&#8217;t going to lose any sleep or money over something like this, their world image is too solidly ingrained to be shaken so easily. But blacks, &#8220;jews&#8221;, hispanics, etc might suffer an increase in discrimination that might directly effect their quality of living. </p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
The Anthroblogogist<br />
<a href="http://TheAnthroblogogist.50webs.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/TheAnthroblogogist.50webs.com');">http://TheAnthroblogogist.50webs.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish</title>
		<link>http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/#comment-4349</link>
		<dc:creator>Satish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/#comment-4349</guid>
		<description>One difference Mr Ali, over here, Dr. Watson criticized someone. In the example you are giving me, the authors have proven someone to be more superior than someone else.
There's a big difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One difference Mr Ali, over here, Dr. Watson criticized someone. In the example you are giving me, the authors have proven someone to be more superior than someone else.<br />
There&#8217;s a big difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali T.</title>
		<link>http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/#comment-4324</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/#comment-4324</guid>
		<description>On June the 2nd, 2005, The Economist magazine published an article titled "The evolution of intelligence". There, it was suggested that Ashkenazi Jews are genetically smarter. The article and the authors of the original research have not been condemned at all.

Now, James Watson suggests that White Europeans might be smarter. And he is immediately condemned. He might even be punished by his employer.

This shows how media has an anti-White and pro-Jewish orientation. It is clear that if Watson would be Jewish and he would suggest that Jews are smarter, he would not be criticized at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On June the 2nd, 2005, The Economist magazine published an article titled &#8220;The evolution of intelligence&#8221;. There, it was suggested that Ashkenazi Jews are genetically smarter. The article and the authors of the original research have not been condemned at all.</p>
<p>Now, James Watson suggests that White Europeans might be smarter. And he is immediately condemned. He might even be punished by his employer.</p>
<p>This shows how media has an anti-White and pro-Jewish orientation. It is clear that if Watson would be Jewish and he would suggest that Jews are smarter, he would not be criticized at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/#comment-4323</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/#comment-4323</guid>
		<description>This is a very disrespectful article. Very insulting to Dr. Watson and any elderly person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very disrespectful article. Very insulting to Dr. Watson and any elderly person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ter</title>
		<link>http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/#comment-4242</link>
		<dc:creator>ter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/#comment-4242</guid>
		<description>I agree with the writer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the writer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/#comment-4220</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.satishsays.com/2007/10/18/dr-watson-you-need-some-rest/#comment-4220</guid>
		<description>He's a racist, but he's obviously one of the most distinguished geneticists of our time, so you can't discount his views because they offend you. It's not that black people are genetically "inferior" but rather have genetically "different." When your ancestors live for several thousand years in a place like Africa, your bodies will evolve to meet the needs of surviving in Africa. It's not melanin, it's traits that through thousands of years, are more prominent in people who benefit from them. Athleticism and sexuality will be stressed, considering the environment insists upon the ability to tough out droughts/famine/lions and compensate for a low child life expectancy. It's the same way Asian people excel at math, yet aren't (for the most part) adept at sports; an isolated culture with no natural predators leads quiet nicely into a civilization that would value intellectual exploits, but has no need for broad shoulders. This isn't saying there's no incredibly intelligent black people, or incredibly athletic Asian people; of course there are. Zora Neale Hurston and Yao Ming disprove assumptions like that. What Watson does mean is that on average, races will demonstrate traits characteristically beneficial to their habitats, as any other creature in the world would. Genetically, some people DO have evolved skills that, in a western culture, translate to intelligence, and other haven't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s a racist, but he&#8217;s obviously one of the most distinguished geneticists of our time, so you can&#8217;t discount his views because they offend you. It&#8217;s not that black people are genetically &#8220;inferior&#8221; but rather have genetically &#8220;different.&#8221; When your ancestors live for several thousand years in a place like Africa, your bodies will evolve to meet the needs of surviving in Africa. It&#8217;s not melanin, it&#8217;s traits that through thousands of years, are more prominent in people who benefit from them. Athleticism and sexuality will be stressed, considering the environment insists upon the ability to tough out droughts/famine/lions and compensate for a low child life expectancy. It&#8217;s the same way Asian people excel at math, yet aren&#8217;t (for the most part) adept at sports; an isolated culture with no natural predators leads quiet nicely into a civilization that would value intellectual exploits, but has no need for broad shoulders. This isn&#8217;t saying there&#8217;s no incredibly intelligent black people, or incredibly athletic Asian people; of course there are. Zora Neale Hurston and Yao Ming disprove assumptions like that. What Watson does mean is that on average, races will demonstrate traits characteristically beneficial to their habitats, as any other creature in the world would. Genetically, some people DO have evolved skills that, in a western culture, translate to intelligence, and other haven&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
